I focused on a small part of a flower, at close to minimum focus distance with the lens only (no Raynox or tubes) and took some shots at f/2.8, f/4, f/5.6 and f/8. I could not replicate it on my own with my copy of the lens. I had not seen this in my use at all, and I did some very informal test shots just to see if I could replicate it with mine. I read his review of the lens just a couple days ago and saw that he mentioned the focus shift issue. How about focus shift, as reported by TDP? The EF lens is still great, but the RF lens just takes everything great and makes them better. Well, in my opinion they did a great job. The EF version was one of my most used lenses and I was hoping Canon would release something that would really push the RF version well above the extremely good EF lens. I'm obviously really happy with this lens. If I used the built-in focus bracketing I'll mention it in the descriptionġ5 shot stack using built-in focus bracketingĤ5 shot stack using built-in focus bracketing Some of these shots are stacks, all images are hand-held. These images are exported from Lightroom in a reduced size as the original files are huge and I've had this page crash when uploading them before. It really is a lot of fun to shoot with this lens so I find myself going out a lot more during the day and trying to find something to shoot with it. Here are some shots I've taken over the week+ that I've had this lens. Maybe if I have some time to mess around with it I'll change my mind, but at this point it's pretty low on my list. For what I like to shoot with macro lenses (insect and such mainly) I just don't see much of a use for it. I haven't touched this at all as of yet, and from what I've read I doubt that I will overall. I was able to shoot with the EF version down to 1/30th and the RF version has allowed me to do the same, but I haven't tried to push it on purpose at this point. The RF lens with the R5 is supposed to give some crazy stabilization, and it may but I haven't noticed anything too extreme compared to the EF version on my R5 as well. However, for me I found that the AF in the Canon lenses does work quite well and can help me zero in on a subject that I might lose otherwise, so I'm usually using One Shot AF as it allows me to focus using AF as needed, and then move myself bock/forth to adjust focus as well if needed. I know a lot of people that shoot macro pretty much use manual focus most, if not all the time. Another reason to have the distance meter in the EVF as it easily helps you quickly determine which way you need to focus. A quick twist of the focus ring will usually bring it back pretty fast. The lens will still occasionally focus behind the subject, but this isn't an issue with the lens as it's just an inherent issue with mirror less cameras. It also hunts a lot less than the EF version does on average. It's easy to tell that the AF is faster and MUCH quieter. The AF in the new RF 100mm Macro lens is certainly improved over the EF version. It's pretty obvious, but I thought I'd point it out. It was always a guessing game with the EF version of the lens if you were able to get closer or not.Ī quick side-not though, if you use extension tubes or attachments like a Raynox DCR-250, the focus distance meter, and approx magnification is no longer accurate. When using the RF 100mm Macro lens, the focus distance meter also includes an approx magnification indication as well. And considering how good the EF lens is, had the RF retained a 1x magnification I doubt I would have bought it, and I certainly would not have pre-ordered it.Ī nice benefit of having an EVF, I was able to setup my R5 to have the focus distance meter always in view whether using AF of MF. The RF version, having 1.4x compared to the EF version 1x, was a big step for what I like to do. This was the biggest selling point for me upgrading to this lens. I'll also sometimes be using a Raynox DCR-250 or 150 attached as well just to provide a bit more magnification. Having the same 67mm filter thread as the EF version was nice as I didn't have to change anything when swapping from the EF to the RF lens.ĭepending on what I'm shooting I'll use a flash, specifically the Yongnou YN-24EX with a set of diffusers from Macroscopic Solutions. I really liked the feel of it, and it actually felt lighter in the hand compared to the EF 100mm L Macro lens, although based on the specs it seems that the RF actually weighs slightly more. My initial reaction to this lens when I first tried it out was very good. I've had the RF 100mm Macro lens now for just over one week and working from home has allowed me to get a lot more use in then I normally would have been able to.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |